Видео

The object was captured from both sides and there was used the mask's workflow. The workflow starts at ruclips.net/video/tw6wNNEbH_M/видео.html

You just need to download an app for that. I suppose there are more suitable.

I suppose there were used pre-defined settings.

Hi, do you mean that the sides of your object are not aligned into one component? How is your overlap between images? How many rows have you used to capture your object from both sides? Are the masks applied in your process? If not, do you have the proper naming convention?

@@CapturingReality The number of pictures is at least 100 photos for each side. I do everything as in the video. When I load the images with the masks I press the tab key and check if everything is normal. When I ask it to detect the photos, it calculates the edges separately. It does not combine them and display them as a model.

@@faridmuradov9623 Not just the number of images is important, also the way how they are captured and what it the overlap between them. What kind of object have you captured? It would be good to see your project somehow... What do you mean by: When I ask it to detect the photos ? Is there something similar for both sides of your capturing on the object? You can also try to merge the components using the control points.

You can find some basic info here: www.capturingreality.com/realitycapture#:~:text=RealityCapture%20DataSheet Other useful information can be find here: dev.epicgames.com/community/capturing-reality/learning The results won't be the same for such cameras.

Hi, please check this post: forums.unrealengine.com/t/a-depth-map-for-filtering-is-corrupted/1698231

What kind of crash have you received? What were your used settings?

​@@CapturingRealityLack of memory caused the problem, but I've fixed it. It's hard to export and merge them now. I will use them in my cesium project.

It depends on your computers parameters, the number and quality of the images and used reconstruction settings.

Not exactly. But you can create a walk-through video from computed model in RealityCapture.

Hi, we are sorry for that. What kind of object have you scanned?

@@CapturingReality A sculpture of a head, 15 cm tall, white colour. with a xiaomi redmi note 11.

@@CapturingReality almost all tbe photos go red and is almost imposible to get a dots cloud.

@@federicofelici9703 As it is just white color it is possible that there is not possible to find the image features to align the images. Have you tried some other object with better surface texture?

To see more different images at once. But it is not a necessary step.

Hi, it depends on the number of the images, but batch rename is more convenient. I suppose you just need to follow the naming conventions. And also disable those images, which won't be used for texturing.

Hi, this is just a warning message that there are some images in CSV file which are not included in your project. You can continue ordinary in the process.

@@CapturingReality Thank you for taking into consideration the question I asked, being interested in it, and answering the question I asked.

I suppose Revit works better with point clouds, so all you need to do is create a model and export point cloud from it.

For the building you need to watch the overlap images. As basic you can follow 1:4 rule (to 4m distance from the building move 1 m to a side) which should keep about 75% overlap between the images.

Hi, for the texture projection there were some data projectors with the texture image.

To which part of the video you are referring to? Yes, RealityCapture computes the distortion parameters during alignment, but you need to choose, which model will be used there.

@@CapturingReality The "adobe lightroom" part at the beginning. I adjust only highlights/shadows/exposure and color temp, I leave the rest to RC. Also: I've seen you are using .tiff files, are the results better than converting RAW files to high quality jpgs? Does it increase processing time?

@@dainjah Can you write a time? I am not able to find it. You can use various formats. I suppose TIFFs should be better than JPG. In that case you can also use the layers workflow - JPGs will be used for alignment and meshing, TIFFs for texturing.

@@CapturingReality 12:40. I just wondered if you used tiffs because they give you denser point cloud (no compression). Anyways, I need to do some testing even with .dng files. I hope my PC can handle it :)

@@dainjah OK, so I suppose you can compute the lens distortion parameters and use those in the alignment process, but it is not recommended to undistord the images before using them in RealityCapture. You can keep that for it. Regarding the format, it depends on your needs. but those TIFFs could take more time to process. Resulted mesh shouldn't be so different. It also depends on the way how the images were compressed.

Scene 3d > tools > Scene Alignment > Set Ground Plane

Hi, you can check this tutorial, which is more educational: ruclips.net/video/kRD0rgCnOWQ/видео.html You can also try to simplify your model and then import into UE.

You can do this in the software, you just select the interval the images are taken at and RC will make the stills for you. It can be useful in some very specific situations, but the results are far inferior to stills due to 4k being lower res than most stills and video compression artefacts. It is equally efficient to use interval shooting mode with stills, and there is no compromise on quality.

Let they hire you guy 😅😅😅😅😅.

Yup agree, I use Reality Capture and know my way around, but it’s not particularly intuitive.

Hi, all available datasets can be find here: www.capturingreality.com/sample-datasets The principles of the processing are then the same.

@@CapturingReality Thankyou

Hi, to show the widgets you need to click on the reconstruction region.

Any phone It only need photos

No Special Sensors needed, but you get better models with better camera quality

what do you mean by the latest RC version?

@@chemjblab Latest Reality Capture (RC) i suppose :)

In most cases the images are better that video (better resolution, focus, stability, no blur) and basically you should receive a better model from still images than from video. Therefore the images are used in the process.

Hi, it works that way. It confirms the measurement and goes to next the image.

Mine does not do this. I can create a recording for you. It would be a huge improvement if it both confirmed and moved to the next image. I’m using the latest free version.

@@alonsorobots Feel free to record the video. For the suggestion you need to see the unassigned control points in 1Ds view (the ones with green plus sign next to them). Then you need to open the image with control point in 2D view, hover the mouse over the point, click and push the left mouse button, correct the control point's position and confirm it by pushing the down arrow key (6:09 in the video).

@@CapturingReality I realize now that you have to click and *hold down* the left mouse button for it to auto confirm and move unto next. Also, for me it's not the down arrow key, but the left and right arrow keys. Maybe it's a language difference?

@@alonsorobots No, it is not a language difference. Left/right key shows the next image in the capturing order, up/down key shows the image where the point is suggested.